Kashf al-Fitan

Two: The Haddaadiyyah are a splinter group from the Takfiris of al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun and they appeared during the early to mid-90s with their extremist views, fraudulently cloaking themselves with the gown of Salafiyyah. Their aim was to infuse their extremism in the name of Salafiyyah in order to tarnish it. Their leader was Mahmood al-Haddaad. Today, their celebrity line-up includes a person called Ahmad al-Haazimee who has some wild statements of Takfir. Some splits and further tribulations have appeared amongst these Kharijites, and just as Wahb bin Munabbih noted more than 1300 years ago, this ideology is such that it implodes, divides and leads to mutual charges of disbelief.

Within this context, some time later, I wrote an article in (September 2013) titled, "A Refutation of Musa Millington and Abu Fujoor al-Kanadi: Shaykh Rabee' on those Who Accuse al-Albaanee of Irjaa Due to the Phrase Actions are a Condition of Perfection in Eemaan" (see here), which was a refutation of the Haddaadiyah in general, against the original Haddadis (Mahmood al-Haddaad) and the second wave (al-Harbi, al-Bahraini) and then against these Hajurite Haddadis who started grazing in the pastures of the Haddaadiyah before them and who made use of this issue to accuse the Salafis with what their predecessors had accused Imaam al-Albani and others with. This being a cheap opportunistic attempt on their behalf to belittle those who did not agree with Yahya al-Hajuri. So in that article, all of them were lumped together, because they all employed this issue for their own nefarious ends, and hence the refutation of Shaykh Rabee in (that article) was a refutation against all three of these groups because all three are grazing in the same pasture and eating from the same grass and coming from the same angle in order to attack Ahl al-Sunnah, even if the likes of Musa Millington and Abu Fujoor protest they do not accuse al-Albani of al-Irjaa'. You chose to eat from the same pastures where that accusation came from, and hence you will be rightly mentioned in connection with those in whose pastures you chose to graze.

Maḥmūd al-Ḥaddād seeded the Ḥaddādī ideology which is based on exaggerating excusable and unintended errors and slips to facilitate tabdīʿ as a destructive weapon to use against Ahl al-Sunnah, and to infuse divisions and enmities among them, all out of sympathy and support for the political aḥzāb and their goals. The associate of Maḥmūd al-Ḥaddād, ʿAbd al-Laṭīf Bāshmīl, claimed that the Shaykhs of Madīnah, such as Shaykh Rabīʿ bin Hādī (رحمه الله) were calling to a deviant political methodology in complete secrecy built upon the errors of Shaykh al-Albānī (رحمه الله). Bāshmīl became the main promulgator, spokesman and caller to the ideology in the late 1990s. After them, came the second wave Ḥaddādīs in the 2000s such as Fāliḥ al-Ḥarbī, then Fawzī al-Baḥraynī and they carried on the methodology with their own infusions.

Indeed, the problems and tribulations of ʿAbd al-Laṭīf require reflection, contemplation and deep thought and what he makes apparent of loyalty to the state and to some of the scholars through deception and cunning cannot be taken (at face value). The problems of ʿAbd al-Laṭīf, his tribulation ( fitnah) and his tumult require the principle of ʿUmar (رضي الله عنه), the second righteous caliph and the great genius (al-ʿabqariyy al-ʿaḍhīm), that barrier in the face tribulations: ‘I am not a deceiver, nor can I be deceived by a deceiver’ and (it requires) the comprehension of Ibn ʿAbbās (رضي الله عنه) which strikes deep.

From the main activities of the first couple of waves of Hadaadiyyah (Mahmoud al-Haddaad and his followers, and then Falih al-Harbi, Fawzi al-Bahraini and their folllowers) was to accuse the Imaams and Scholars of Ahl al-Sunnah of al-Irjaa'. In this respect Imaam al-Albaani was a primary target (and to a lesser extent Imaams Ibn Baaz and Imaam Ibn al-Uthaymeen). During the mid-2000s the same accusation was levelled by Falih al-Harbee and Fawzee al-Bahraini against Shaykh Rabee and they accused him of saying that actions are a condition for the perfection of eemaan (something for which they spoke with respect to Imaam al-Albani as had the Haddadis before them).

During the mid-2000s the same accusation was levelled by Falih al-Harbee and Fawzee al-Bahraini against Shaykh Rabee and they accused him of saying that actions are a condition for the perfection of eemaan (something for which they spoke with respect to Imaam al-Albani as had the Haddadis before them). There are a number of issues around which the Haddaddiyah revolve in order to attack Ahl al-Sunnah and accuse them of al-Irjaa. From them, a) the issue of the excuse of ignorance (al-udhru bil-jahl), and also b) the statement of actions being shart kamaal (condition of perfection) and c) the issue of jins al-amal (genus of action). Because there are sometimes conflicting statements or ambiguity in the statements of the Scholars (past and present) in discussing these issues, it is fertile ground for the likes of the Haddaadiyyah to enter into these areas as a strategic move and start constructing accusations against the People of the Sunnah based upon the ambiguities therein and carefully selecting from the various statements of the Scholars in order to construct a case.

In his 9 page article, Abu Waaqid Abdullah bin Salih al-Qahtani, exposes the vile tongue of Yahya al-Hajuri al-Haddadi, when he came to learn that Shaykh Rabee' had stated to a group of visitors (who had come from the tribal areas of Waadi'ah at the end of Rajab 1432H) about him (يحيى الحجوري سفيه و حدادي خبيث لا بارك الله فيه), "Yahya al-Hajuri is a fool and a vile Haddaadi, may Allaah not bless him." When this came to the attention of the Hajaawirah, they did not know how to respond and whereas previously they were very bold in attacking, by name, the other Mashaayikh, such as Shaykh Ubayd, Shaykh Muhammad and Shaykh Abdullah, this time they were a little more cowardly.

There is a matter that is took place around 18 months ago whereby Shaykh Rabee' had rightfully declared al-Hajuri as a "Haddadi" extremist. When the Hoothee Rafidah began to attack Dammaaj, the Shaykh was concerned for the da'wah and continued to give leeway for al-Hajuri to return to the truth, and showed benevolence to him. In the course of these events, the owner of the Oloom website (Khalid al-Gharbani) spread some things he claimed about Shaykh Rabee (after a meeting with the Shaykh) which were lies. In this article we are going to document the exposition of Khalid al-Gharbani in this particular episode. Some brothers wrote about this on the Arabic forums and we present here all the wathaa'iq (documentary evidences). Though this document was prepared around 14 months ago it was not published. As more and more disgraces of al-Hajuri and al-Hajaawirah are becoming public knowledge, it is necessary to add this to the list. Having said all of this, the Hajaawirah are no longer in a position to make this denial of Shaykh Rabee' declaring their leader to be Haddaadi, because now they are attacking Shaykh Rabee' openly, but it just shows how their desires play with them as events transpire and how they follow desires and not the truth.

Refutation of some of the doubts of the Hajurites. Refutation of the one who applied the description of bid'ah to the action of Uthmaan bin Affaan (radiyallaahu anhu). His remarks regarding the description of Shaykh Ubayd al-Jabiree as the " Sabt of the new hizbiyyah." His remark regarding the ascription of hizbiyyah to Shaykh Ubayd al-Jabiree. His statement about al-Hajuri, "He is an idiot, more severe than Faalih, he is not to be studied with." Clarification of the lie of Muhammad al-Siwaree (a Hajurite) in the issue of elections. Refutation of the slander and fabrication of al-Hajuri who claimed that Shaykh Muhammad described Shaykh Muqbil as a Juhaymaanee. Defence of the Scholars of the Sunnah in Yemen and refutation of the transgression of Yahya al-Hajuri and Muhammad al-Siwaree against them. His statement that "al-Hajuri's (affair) ended with Abu al-Hasan and Ali Hasan." Shaykh Arafat al-Muhammadi's citing the agreement of Shaykh Muhammad bin Haaadee with the tabdee of al-Hajuri by Shaykh Muhammad bin Abd al-Wahaab al-Wassaabee.

According to Twitter users known for supporting the Hazimi trend within ISIS - named after the Saudi figure Ahmed Al Hazimi who is known for his views that ignorance is no excuse to being denigrated as an infidel (a practice known as takfir) - claimed that ISIS's leadership has started to execute judges who are accused of excessively using Takfir against those who should be exempt due to ignorance.

Observers noticed that ISIS supporters failed to share the tweet regarding Al-Hattab's execution, whereas for the first times supporters of the Hazimi trend have gained prominence.

In the above PDF reference was made in places about some of the Hajurites (in Netherlands) who have begun to show sympathies towards ISIS (see here) and they also have clear connections with the new Criminal Haddaadi takfiri faction that has emerged, such as Abdul-Hameed al-Juhani, Abdullah al-Ghamidi, Abdullah al-Jarboo' and others.

03. The next specimen is a Facebook post by Haddadi Nederlands which is an answer from the extremist Haddadi, Abdullah al-Jarboo'. First let us say some things about Abdullah al-Jarboo'. He is from al-Madeenah and he is amongst the Haddaadis except that previously he did not fully reveal his condition.